Hy Ryan,
looking at the current scene from offshore, I am not really surprised. I have heard a lot about the poor working conditions at FeF over more than a year and several people on the forum probably now me for my critics on poor designs and sub-standard manufacturing practices in OSE and FeF.
Myself I have no complete knowledge about CED press and PowerCube; always believing these machines were the better results of OSE development.
But seeing OSE product quality in general being poor I am not really surprised by the situation of CEDPress and PowerCube.
The best advice I can give is to start a contact with Brianna Kufa. She has spent several month at Fef, has been active in the development of several machines and to me she seems to be a trustworthy and competent fabricator girl.
If Brianna states that a Powercube works at longest 7 days, I am pretty sure I doesn't work 8 days without a breadown. It may be desillusioning but my strong feeling is that none of the existing GVCS designs is fit for commercial or mass production.
Mike
gonzo wrote:
The GVCS machines can't be bad. The build quality might be, depending on materials. But the designs should be ok, and they can be improved easy, that's the most important thing.
Well, GVCS designs can be bad! Very bad, there are a couple of developments in progress that don't promise any acceptable result, i.e. Tractor, Bulldozer, Truck. And several where there is no progress at all, like steam engine, CNC multimachine..
So, GVCS designs at present can be VERY POOR.
But I must admit, the CEB press doesn't look like a complete design error. Therefore IMO it is the manufacturing quality that makes them poor performer, or maybe only a fraction of them works poor.
The power cube is a different story. I don't think that the design has severe design flaws. But there are 2 issues which influence the useability of power cubes:
#1 is FeFs practice of always buying the cheapest raw material and components, preforably from doubtful surplus sources. I don't expect they get their hands on quality components this way.
#2 is the concept of power cubes. If You buy a (commercial built) tractor or truck, You can expect the large diesel engine to operate without a major repair for more or less 5000 operating hours.
And that ist something that You can't expect from the small gasoline engines in power cubes, nearly none of them will come even close to 5000 hours of operation. And engine lifespan will even be shorter if you buy these engines from susceptible surplus suppliers.
But generally spoken, its a problem with the power cube concept. Small gas engines usually don't have the lifespan of much larger diesel engines.
Mike
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!