<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
      <title>Project Management - Open Source Ecology Forums</title>
      <link>http://forum.opensourceecology.org/categories/project-management/feed.rss</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 12 00:05:53 +0200</pubDate>
         <description>Project Management - Open Source Ecology Forums</description>
   <language>en-CA</language>
   <atom:link href="/discussions/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
   <item>
      <title>Wiki Layout and Design Flow</title>
      <link>http://forum.opensourceecology.org/discussion/600/wiki-layout-and-design-flow</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:29:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Mike_Apostol</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">600@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Hey guys,<div><br /></div><div>I've been working on a mind map of how the wiki should be structured. &nbsp;I'm trying to capture how the process flow will work with an iterative release process and parallel but different style projects (i.e. manual ceb press and automatic ceb press)</div><div><br /></div><div>Here's the link to the mind map:</div><div><a href="http://www.mindomo.com/edit.htm?m=52d4973258d3470e8463ad0e8c7edc4a" target="_blank">http://www.mindomo.com/edit.htm?m=52d4973258d3470e8463ad0e8c7edc4a</a></div><div><br /></div><div>You can collapse and expand areas by clicking on the little "plus/minus" by the text box. Also there are notes on some of the text boxes for some of my further thoughts on it. I attached a screen shot of it, but you don't get access to the comments with it but should get the general idea.</div><div><br /></div><div>The basic idea is that you have the tool home page that has general information about what it does and then there is a design tree that shows the evolution of the designs in terms of what generation it is or design style (i.e. horizontal vs vertically oriented CEB Press). The nav bar on this page would have links to the "current released FeF design" but the design eveolution tree provides links to the other design styles and versions in an easily visible manner.</div><div><br /></div><div>Each version has it's own wiki and a nav bar on the top to the fields of R&amp;D, Build and Operate, etc. specific to that tool. There can certainly be shared pages among versions but ultimately each should be able to stand on its own.</div><div><br /></div><div>I may have to do specific invite e-mails for editing, so if that's the case send me an e-mail or pm with your e-mail.</div><div><br /></div><div>I think this is a pretty big priority as it hasn't been addressed is going to lead to a confusing and crazy wiki (more so than it already is!). So lets work together on this and try and get at least a first version of the layout worked out!</div>]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>OSE Liability</title>
      <link>http://forum.opensourceecology.org/discussion/566/ose-liability</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:18:04 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mjn</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">566@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[One of the topics that came up for discussion by PMs is OSE liability.&nbsp; There are several aspects that we should consider:<br /><br /><ol><li>What are our legal liabilities in publishing GVCS designs?</li><li>What minimal safety (etc) requirements must be met?</li><li>How can we protect OSE against possible lawsuits?</li><li>What are the state, federal, and international aspects of liability?</li></ol>- Mark<br /><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Welcome</title>
      <link>http://forum.opensourceecology.org/discussion/565/welcome</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:11:44 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>mjn</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">565@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Welcome to the new OSE Project Management forum.<br /><br />Since several people have stepped up to assume project manager<br />    responsibility for OSE projects, I believe there is a need<br />    for a discussion group, forum, or email list for OSE PMs.&nbsp; Here, we can discuss:<br /><br />    <ul><li>Cross-project synergies and collaboration</li><li>Volunteer management and recruitment</li><li>Resource needs and allocation</li><li>GVCS coordination</li><li>Documentation standards</li><li>Etc.</li></ul>Contributions to this forum is restricted to members with a project manager role, though it is visible to the entire OSE community.&nbsp; This allows PMs to focus discussion and they preserve transparency.<br /><br />- Mark Norton<br /><br />]]></description>
   </item>
   <item>
      <title>Quality Control</title>
      <link>http://forum.opensourceecology.org/discussion/567/quality-control</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:32:14 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>James_Bunny_Slade</dc:creator>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">567@/discussions</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Would like to get everyone's thoughts on doing quality control on each piece of equipment made. QC would cover from assembly, testing of specifications, x hour testing checks and maintenance. This would help us deliver solid data and help us have a constant standard. I've already begun a script for the LifeTrac that I can share later. Getting the CEB, Pulverizer and PowerCube done as well should be priority.]]></description>
   </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
